This discussion document offers an analysis of the power asymmetry between China and Russia. It assesses the China-Russia relationship on three parameters: geopolitical alignment, economic integration and military ties, to uncover the extent of Moscow’s dependence on Beijing to realise its overarching geostrategic goals.
This discussion document offers a comparative study of India and China’s consumption trends. The study attempts to compare the size and demography of the existing consumer base and the consumption expenditure. It reveals that India’s consumption figures are disproportionately higher than China’s for the size of its economy.
This document compares data on the Chinese economy, and assesses projections surrounding the rebounding of the economy in the aftermath of the scrapping of the Zero-COVID policy. It further highlights the headwinds facing the economy in key areas such as domestic consumption, real estate, net exports, local government debt, and Foreign Direct Investment.
Debates around dependence-induced strategic and critical vulnerabilities have gained traction with an end objective to reduce or mitigate them. To prevent a one-size-fits-all approach emanating from the lack of conceptual differentiation, this paper presents a framework through a series of tests to understand whether trade in a certain commodity between countries can be classified as a critical vulnerability.
This Policy Brief proposes that G20 countries must cooperate to mitigate asymmetry in crucial supply chain-related information among stakeholders across the value chain in order to address data asymmetry-induced disruptions. The G20 is best suited to create such a framework, given that they constitute 20 of the world’s largest economies and will have to directly confront the challenges of supply chain disruptions.
This paper seeks to contribute to the understanding of China’s behaviour along the India-China border by exploring a fresh perspective that explains the instability along the border as a function of China’s two-front conundrum. It makes a historical account of past events to argue that China’s two-front threat perception is not new. It concludes that Beijing has used instability along the LAC as a tool to manage its two-front threat.
Various explanations have been proffered for Chinese President Xi Jinping’s renewed emphasis on ideology. This paper weighs in, and finds that in current Chinese ideology, the revolutionary impulse has regained its place alongside nationalism. The paper investigates this phenomenon—seen perhaps only during the Mao era—and attributes it to Xi’s desire to repair the authority crisis at the apex leadership seen under the presidencies of those who preceded him.
POSITION PAPER
POSITION PAPER
Copyright © 2024 AMIT KUMAR - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.